<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html</link>
	<description>Life and Politics in Democratic Bhutan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dorji</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>dorji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>News of third party is welcome. We need  more parties for better competition. Only through competition do we get better people. 
Having said that, we need to find ways or means to fund our parties. With no funding from the government, not many people will be encouraged to form a party with the dismal funding situation of the two existing parties.
Why don&#039;t govt and opposition amend  Constitution if it is good for the democracy and Bhutan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News of third party is welcome. We need  more parties for better competition. Only through competition do we get better people.<br />
Having said that, we need to find ways or means to fund our parties. With no funding from the government, not many people will be encouraged to form a party with the dismal funding situation of the two existing parties.<br />
Why don&#8217;t govt and opposition amend  Constitution if it is good for the democracy and Bhutan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>If it depended on just your vote, then perhaps you would be correct in saying that DPT will be defeated in the next elections. As of now I don&#039;t see any party challenging the DPT in the next elections, sadly for some people that is the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it depended on just your vote, then perhaps you would be correct in saying that DPT will be defeated in the next elections. As of now I don&#8217;t see any party challenging the DPT in the next elections, sadly for some people that is the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-3036</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-3036</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, a third party will remain a wishful dream. In fact, I am worried that we may not have enough credible people to sustain two parties.

Even if the third party does come, I can guarantee you that you wouldn&#039;t want to vote for them. Just pray that the PDP members do not resign from the party and politics on the grounds of their last defeat. PDP does have good people and may be if the DPT keeps repeating things like the CDG, PDP is destined to be your next government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, a third party will remain a wishful dream. In fact, I am worried that we may not have enough credible people to sustain two parties.</p>
<p>Even if the third party does come, I can guarantee you that you wouldn&#8217;t want to vote for them. Just pray that the PDP members do not resign from the party and politics on the grounds of their last defeat. PDP does have good people and may be if the DPT keeps repeating things like the CDG, PDP is destined to be your next government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinlay</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-3027</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-3027</guid>
		<description>Political parties will become unstable if there is no state funding. If parties have to depend on private, corporation, individual, or business donation then vested interest groups will influence the partie&#039;s decisions. The ultimate sufferers will be ordinary folks, both in the urban and rural areas. Then where is the excitement??

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political parties will become unstable if there is no state funding. If parties have to depend on private, corporation, individual, or business donation then vested interest groups will influence the partie&#8217;s decisions. The ultimate sufferers will be ordinary folks, both in the urban and rural areas. Then where is the excitement??</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zampolo</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>zampolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>well,i too feel that two parties should be adequate for a small nation like bHUTAN where the population is less than 7 lakhs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well,i too feel that two parties should be adequate for a small nation like bHUTAN where the population is less than 7 lakhs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tshering Lhendup</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>Tshering Lhendup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>This news is welcome.
 DPT will be defeated in next Election because of PM Jigme Thinley&#039;s inaction and indecision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This news is welcome.<br />
 DPT will be defeated in next Election because of PM Jigme Thinley&#8217;s inaction and indecision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zekom</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Zekom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>Dear Wang Dungyel,

You raise very interesting and very important points of substance.

But, first, about the facts. USA, UK and Japan all permit more than 2 parties (and independents) to contest elections and they do so in fact.  Election results in these countries have tended to generate 2 dominant parties, but with a coalition of two or more parties needed to form a government from time to time (as demonstrated more recently in the case of Japan and a number of European countries).

You speak of confusion and tension among the people. This is indeed a very important observation, on which we should not lose our focus…

But, I think they have nothing to do with the NUMBER of parties contesting, but everything to do with HOW they contest the elections.  It’s about the behavior of party workers at the grass roots.  It’s about their respective party’s professed “corporate” principles not permeating deeply into how they work where the machinery hits the road.  

So, as in many things, it’s all about the corporate management – how well political parties are managed, to reflect their corporate vision, values, ethics and operating rules throughout the organization in very REAL ways that TOUCH the people.  

Frankly speaking, neither parties did well in this management work. I hope they have learned their lessons well, because their management excellence has an enormous and real impact on the wholesome development of our democracy.

On the number of parties themselves …

Monopoly is bad and so is duopoly. Just look at the quality of customer service by any of our large corporations, be they in banking, insurance, electricity, telecommunications … Concentration of power in marketplace tends to end up taking advantage of the very people the very “power” is meant to serve.  Ditto, in politics.

But, a number of suppliers in a marketplace alone won’t lead to customer satisfaction. Consumers have to be well informed about their choice. This is why one finds consumer organizations in mature market economies all over the world. Ditto, again, in politics. 

Citizens have to be well informed about their political choice. A number of parties alone won’t solve the imbalance of power between the organized politicians and disorganized citizens, UNLESS information about the political choice is easily made available to the electorates in ways that is credibly independent of politics. 

What we need, badly, is politically independent civil society organizations that work to create a well-informed citizenry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Wang Dungyel,</p>
<p>You raise very interesting and very important points of substance.</p>
<p>But, first, about the facts. USA, UK and Japan all permit more than 2 parties (and independents) to contest elections and they do so in fact.  Election results in these countries have tended to generate 2 dominant parties, but with a coalition of two or more parties needed to form a government from time to time (as demonstrated more recently in the case of Japan and a number of European countries).</p>
<p>You speak of confusion and tension among the people. This is indeed a very important observation, on which we should not lose our focus…</p>
<p>But, I think they have nothing to do with the NUMBER of parties contesting, but everything to do with HOW they contest the elections.  It’s about the behavior of party workers at the grass roots.  It’s about their respective party’s professed “corporate” principles not permeating deeply into how they work where the machinery hits the road.  </p>
<p>So, as in many things, it’s all about the corporate management – how well political parties are managed, to reflect their corporate vision, values, ethics and operating rules throughout the organization in very REAL ways that TOUCH the people.  </p>
<p>Frankly speaking, neither parties did well in this management work. I hope they have learned their lessons well, because their management excellence has an enormous and real impact on the wholesome development of our democracy.</p>
<p>On the number of parties themselves …</p>
<p>Monopoly is bad and so is duopoly. Just look at the quality of customer service by any of our large corporations, be they in banking, insurance, electricity, telecommunications … Concentration of power in marketplace tends to end up taking advantage of the very people the very “power” is meant to serve.  Ditto, in politics.</p>
<p>But, a number of suppliers in a marketplace alone won’t lead to customer satisfaction. Consumers have to be well informed about their choice. This is why one finds consumer organizations in mature market economies all over the world. Ditto, again, in politics. </p>
<p>Citizens have to be well informed about their political choice. A number of parties alone won’t solve the imbalance of power between the organized politicians and disorganized citizens, UNLESS information about the political choice is easily made available to the electorates in ways that is credibly independent of politics. </p>
<p>What we need, badly, is politically independent civil society organizations that work to create a well-informed citizenry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wang Dungyel</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>Wang Dungyel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>I feel two parties are just enough for a small country like Bhutan. Look at USA, Great Britain, Japan, and other countries. They just have two parties from inception of democratic system and it is working best. Having too many parties in Bhutan at this stage will simply confuse the villagers and will only create more tensions among the community as observed in the last elections. Majority of the member for the third parties if that come up should also come from the civil servant fertinity after resigning. Civil servants are now aware and understand that resigning is suicidal as experienced in the past elections. Where are the leaders then? Picking unemployed graduates for the parties doesn’t make sense, as these people are not worth enough to get a job. Sound harsh but sorry I can’t help in expressing my view. Anybody there who share my views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel two parties are just enough for a small country like Bhutan. Look at USA, Great Britain, Japan, and other countries. They just have two parties from inception of democratic system and it is working best. Having too many parties in Bhutan at this stage will simply confuse the villagers and will only create more tensions among the community as observed in the last elections. Majority of the member for the third parties if that come up should also come from the civil servant fertinity after resigning. Civil servants are now aware and understand that resigning is suicidal as experienced in the past elections. Where are the leaders then? Picking unemployed graduates for the parties doesn’t make sense, as these people are not worth enough to get a job. Sound harsh but sorry I can’t help in expressing my view. Anybody there who share my views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tshewang</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator>Tshewang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-2987</guid>
		<description>Oh thats good news. i think this new party has enough fund to survive for long term.to my analysis any party cannot survive if there is full support of political funds from internal and external.ECB and Govt. do something for political parties to survive.As per ECB rules every political parties should have office in all dzongkhags. With this current situtaions(huge loans) i predict one day political parties of bhutan will not be there to contest election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh thats good news. i think this new party has enough fund to survive for long term.to my analysis any party cannot survive if there is full support of political funds from internal and external.ECB and Govt. do something for political parties to survive.As per ECB rules every political parties should have office in all dzongkhags. With this current situtaions(huge loans) i predict one day political parties of bhutan will not be there to contest election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sautay</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/democracy/2009/better-party.html#comment-2984</link>
		<dc:creator>sautay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 04:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1403#comment-2984</guid>
		<description>More number of shops, better bargaining</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More number of shops, better bargaining</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
