<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dangerous standoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html</link>
	<description>Life and Politics in Democratic Bhutan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:25:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: di</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-2097</link>
		<dc:creator>di</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-2097</guid>
		<description>sonam, the NC did not adjourn for the day, they only adjourned for the time that was allotted to the question time, after which they resumed their deliberations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sonam, the NC did not adjourn for the day, they only adjourned for the time that was allotted to the question time, after which they resumed their deliberations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apolo</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Apolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 08:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>Which version of NC ACt are your referring to? Perhaps the one drafted by OL..ha..ha..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which version of NC ACt are your referring to? Perhaps the one drafted by OL..ha..ha..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonamG</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>sonamG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>Well said Linda, But I think though the present NA members do have the necessary qualification they are not as educated as the past NA members &quot;CHIMIS&quot;. Chimis did a very commendable job without degree qualification and exposure. And Chimis never did shy away from Cameras.

Whatever it is they are still learning and let us hope for the best. If there is not much progress then we the people have the power to choose the best candidate who will conduct well like the OL and his friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Linda, But I think though the present NA members do have the necessary qualification they are not as educated as the past NA members &#8220;CHIMIS&#8221;. Chimis did a very commendable job without degree qualification and exposure. And Chimis never did shy away from Cameras.</p>
<p>Whatever it is they are still learning and let us hope for the best. If there is not much progress then we the people have the power to choose the best candidate who will conduct well like the OL and his friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda wangmo</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1986</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda wangmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1986</guid>
		<description>Dear Sonam G

You are right People also elected the members of NA but then I dont see any help comming from The NA members. Their Dranam and drangdem is long gone after the election and on top of that there is no way that the NA members would ask questions to their own party minister. The Only work the members of NA and Ministers would do is just do the opposition leaders work by attacking the opposition leader. I personally want the NC members to keep on calling the ministers for question and answer session. If needed I would even like you to request the prime minister and the Opposition leader for q and A session.

By the way the NA members said it is a wastage to have live telecast specially for BBS. I would like to remind that they are wasting more money by having the national assembly because if they want to do it without live telecast then they can have the national assembly in their office in Languphakha.  DPT please remember that during his Majestys time there was no live telecast because during that time most of the members were illitrate and they are like Dasho Tshering Penjo and Dasho Pasang Thinlry who just uses their mouth so that time the government felt usesless to have such live telecast. But now the present members were qualified and we ellected them and the government should not Ban live coverage just for the emmbrasment for Pasa thinley and tshering Penjor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sonam G</p>
<p>You are right People also elected the members of NA but then I dont see any help comming from The NA members. Their Dranam and drangdem is long gone after the election and on top of that there is no way that the NA members would ask questions to their own party minister. The Only work the members of NA and Ministers would do is just do the opposition leaders work by attacking the opposition leader. I personally want the NC members to keep on calling the ministers for question and answer session. If needed I would even like you to request the prime minister and the Opposition leader for q and A session.</p>
<p>By the way the NA members said it is a wastage to have live telecast specially for BBS. I would like to remind that they are wasting more money by having the national assembly because if they want to do it without live telecast then they can have the national assembly in their office in Languphakha.  DPT please remember that during his Majestys time there was no live telecast because during that time most of the members were illitrate and they are like Dasho Tshering Penjo and Dasho Pasang Thinlry who just uses their mouth so that time the government felt usesless to have such live telecast. But now the present members were qualified and we ellected them and the government should not Ban live coverage just for the emmbrasment for Pasa thinley and tshering Penjor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I am glad i didnt vote</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1985</link>
		<dc:creator>I am glad i didnt vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1985</guid>
		<description>I dont have comments. I am &quot;Pissed Off&quot;.
Sorry OL but I am no choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont have comments. I am &#8220;Pissed Off&#8221;.<br />
Sorry OL but I am no choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zamtap</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>zamtap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>The National Council Act, which we passed just last year, authorizes the Council to: “… summon any person to attend the proceedings of the National Council …” The act also empowers the National Council to “…call the attention of a minister to any matter of urgent public importance” and to “…question the Government during Question Time.”
IF i share my understanding of the NC ACT. there are two clauses. the first one says any person can be &quot;summoned&quot;. then the second empowers the NC to call attention of minister and to question the Govt.
now when NC ask lynpos for oral interview they are summoning them. m i right.?
the ministers need not necessarily go to NC in person.but the should be answerable to the questions which  they are doing.
this is what i understand la</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Council Act, which we passed just last year, authorizes the Council to: “… summon any person to attend the proceedings of the National Council …” The act also empowers the National Council to “…call the attention of a minister to any matter of urgent public importance” and to “…question the Government during Question Time.”<br />
IF i share my understanding of the NC ACT. there are two clauses. the first one says any person can be &#8220;summoned&#8221;. then the second empowers the NC to call attention of minister and to question the Govt.<br />
now when NC ask lynpos for oral interview they are summoning them. m i right.?<br />
the ministers need not necessarily go to NC in person.but the should be answerable to the questions which  they are doing.<br />
this is what i understand la</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ugyen</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>ugyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>.......if things go this way i fear one day natinal council will be called off.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;&#8230;.if things go this way i fear one day natinal council will be called off&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karma S.</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Karma S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Ministers of Bhutan are above law. They think they are to big to be questioned by the NC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ministers of Bhutan are above law. They think they are to big to be questioned by the NC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamtang</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1981</link>
		<dc:creator>lamtang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1981</guid>
		<description>Its noting but ego clashes between nc and ministers!!! Nothing wrong in getting written answers, after all they just want answers to their queries.  nc act says, it can be answered in written or oral. so why is nc harping in personal presence? doesn&#039;t it sound fishy?

on the other hand, whats wrong in attending nc session and answer it orally? after all, they are accountable to parliament. 

So, in nutshell it is just a ego clashes!!!Each wants to give their superiority impression to the public!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its noting but ego clashes between nc and ministers!!! Nothing wrong in getting written answers, after all they just want answers to their queries.  nc act says, it can be answered in written or oral. so why is nc harping in personal presence? doesn&#8217;t it sound fishy?</p>
<p>on the other hand, whats wrong in attending nc session and answer it orally? after all, they are accountable to parliament. </p>
<p>So, in nutshell it is just a ego clashes!!!Each wants to give their superiority impression to the public!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freewill</title>
		<link>http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/legislature/2009/dangerous-standoff.html#comment-1980</link>
		<dc:creator>freewill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tsheringtobgay.com/?p=1015#comment-1980</guid>
		<description>They did not show up because they are scared of live TV coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did not show up because they are scared of live TV coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

